Fundamental (Human) Rights versus Emergency Measures

Excerpts from the Case-law of the CJEU and ECtHR

Authors

  • Dr. Réka Friedery Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence, Budapest, Hungary
  • Dr. Gábor Kecskés Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence, Budapest, Hungary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57947/qrp.v63i2.153

Keywords:

fundamental (human) rights, COVID-19, emergency measures, CJEU, ECtHR

Abstract

The response of States to the outbreak of a COVID-19 pandemic in the European Region from spring 2020, such as curfews, limited opening hours, restrictions on activities, the use of masks and possible vaccination requirements to prevent further spread and mitigate consequences, may raise a number of human rights issues. The role of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) is to ensure that the EU law is observed in the interpretation and application of the Treaties and to work together with the national courts to ensure the uniform interpretation and application of EU law. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is the principal guardian of the European system of human rights protection, based on the European Convention on Human Rights. It is therefore not difficult to see that, in this unique period since the outbreak of the pandemic, the role of the courts has been even more decisive in a number of cases dealing with the fundamental and human rights aspects of the (restrictive) state measures taken in the wake of the COVID-19 epidemic. The paper selects cases from the CJEU and the ECtHR relating to the COVID-19 epidemic. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the approaches and judgments of the two courts, with a focus on providing the reader with a comprehensive overview of the role of the courts in interpreting the law in times of public health emergencies. In addition, the presentation of the cases provides an insight into the measures or procedures used by each Member State to deal with the pandemic.

Author Biographies

Dr. Réka Friedery, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence, Budapest, Hungary

Dr. Réka Friedery is a research fellow at the Department of European Union Law and International Law in the HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Centre for Excellence of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence, Budapest, Hungary.

Dr. Gábor Kecskés, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence, Budapest, Hungary

Dr. Gábor Kecskés is a research fellow at the Department of European Union Law and International Law in the HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences, Centre for Excellence of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre of Excellence Department of European Union Law and International Law, Budapest, Hungary.

References

Alemanno, A. (2020). The European response to COVID-19: From regulatory emulation to Regulatory Coordination? European Journal of Risk Regulation, 11(2), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.44

Beaussier, A.-J., & Cabane, L. (2020). Strengthening the EU’s response capacity to health emergencies: Insights from EU crisis management mechanisms. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 11(4), 808-820. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.80

ECtHR. (2022). Factsheet: Derogation in time of emergency. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/fs_derogation_eng

ECtHR. (2024). Factsheet: Covid-19 health crisis. Press Unit. https://prd-echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/FS_Covid_ENG

Iamiceli, P., & Cafaggi, F. (2024). Decision-making in times of uncertainty and the protection of fundamental rights: A comparative view on global litigation during the pandemic. In P. Iamiceli & F. Cafaggi (Eds.), Covid-19 litigation: The role of national and international courts in global health crises (pp. 11-56). Università die Trento.

Kenwick, M. R., & Simmons, B. (2020). Pandemic response as border politics. International Organization, 74(1), 36-58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000363

Kirchner, S. (Ed.). (2021). Governing the crisis: law, hu man rights and COVID-19. LIT Verlag.

Magyarország Kormánya. (2020, March 3). Koronavírus - Magyarország határozatlan idore felfüggeszti az illegális migránsok beengedését a tranzitzónába. https://2015-2019.kormany.hu/hu/belugyminiszterium/hirek/koronavirus-magyarorszag-hatarozatlan-idore-felfuggeszti-az-illegalis-migransok-beengedeset-a-tranzitzonaba

McQuigg, R. (2024). The European Convention on Human Rights and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Routledge.

Molloy, S. (2020, April 10). Covid-19 and Derogations Before the European Court of Human Rights. VerfBlog. https://dx.doi.org/10.17176/20200410-153051-0

Permanent Representation of the Republic of Albania to the Council of Europe. (2020). Note verbale. https://rm.coe.int/16809e0fe5

Permanent Representation of the Republic of Armenia to the Council of Europe. (2020). Note verbale. https://rm.coe.int/09000016809cf885

Permanent Representation of Estonia to the Council of Europe. (2020). Note verbale. https://rm.coe.int/09000016809cfa88

Permanent Representation of Georgia to the Council of Europe. (2020). Note verbale. https://rm.coe.int/09000016809cff20

Permanent Representation of Latvia to the Council of Europe. (2020). Note verbale. https://rm.coe.int/09000016809ce9f2

Permanent Representation of the Republic of Moldova to the Council of Europe. (2020). Note verbale. https://rm.coe.int/09000016809cf9a2

Permanent Representation of the Republic of North Macedonia to the Council of Europe. (2020). Note verbale. https://rm.coe.int/16809e1288.

Permanent Representation of Romania to the Council of Europe. (2020). Note verbale. https://rm.coe.int/09000016809cee30

Permanent Representation of San Marino to the Council of Europe. (2020). Note verbale. https://rm.coe.int/16809e2770

Permanent Representation of Serbia to the Council of Europe. (2020). Note verbale. https://rm.coe.int/16809e1d98

Vinceti, S. R. (2021). Covid-19 Compulsory Vaccination and the European Court of Human Rights. Acta Biomedica, 92(6), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.23750%2Fabm.v92iS6.12333

World Health Organization. (2020, March 11). WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020

Downloads

Published

06/15/2024

How to Cite

Friedery, R., & Kecskés, G. (2024). Fundamental (Human) Rights versus Emergency Measures: Excerpts from the Case-law of the CJEU and ECtHR. Quarterly on Refugee Problems - AWR Bulletin, 63(2), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.57947/qrp.v63i2.153

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.