The Diplomatic Protection of the Ukrainian Refugees by their State of Asylum

A Possible Scenario for the Day after the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict

Authors

  • Assoc. Prof. Dr. Alberta Fabbricotti University La Sapienza of Rome, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57947/qrp.v62i1.45

Keywords:

international refugee law, diplomatic protection, international responsibility of States, aggression, International Law Commission

Abstract

This article intends to verify the possibility of legitimizing the action in diplomatic protection of refugees vis-à-vis the State from which they have fled by the receiving State. This is a hypothesis that has no basis in traditional international law but which is advanced on the basis of new developments in international practice. The diplomatic protection of refugees by their State of Asylum is therefore the main thesis addressed by the present essay. The questions examined in this article involve various areas and institutes of international law. In particular, two codification projects elaborated by the International Law Commission are here considered: the Draft articles relating to the diplomatic protection of 2006 and the Draft articles on the international responsibility of States of 2001. Is it just a coincidence that both of these projects have not resulted in proper (binding) international conventions? As an appendix, it was deemed interesting to investigate the above thesis considering the huge mass of Ukrainians who fled from their country and who poured into most European countries. Regarding this exodus, the legal reasoning supporting the entitlement of the hosting States to exercise the diplomatic protection is particularly complex and has to unravel in two steps. The first step perlustrates the entitlement/capacity of the receiving State to exercise his right of diplomatic protection. The second step analyses the accountability, under the international law regime on State responsibility, of the State that invaded and occupied the territories from which the Ukrainians were forced to flee.

References

Barber, R. (2022). What does the ’responsibility to protect’ require of States in Ukraine? Journal of International Peacekeeping, 25, 155-177.

Condorelli, L. (2003). La protection diplomatique et l’évolution de son domaine d’application. Rivista di diritto internazionale, 1, 5-26;

Crawford, J. (2017). The International Law Commission’s articles on diplomatic protection revisited. In T. Maluwa, M. du Plessis, & D. Tladi (Eds.), The Pursuit of a Brave New World in International Law: Essays in Honour of John Dugard (pp. 135-171). Brill.

Czaplinski, W. & Sturma, P. (1994). La responsabilité des Etats pour les flux de réfugiés provoqués par eux. Annuaire Français de Droit International, 40, 156-169;

Dugard, J. (2000). First report on diplomatic protection. UN Doc. A/CN.4/506 and Add. 1. https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_506.pdf

Dugard, J. (2005). Diplomatic protection and human rights: The draft articles of the International Law Commission. Australian Yearbook of International Law, 24, 75-91.

Dugard, J. (2021). Diplomatic protection. In A. Peters (Ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 2021. https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1028?rskey=UL3Cwo&result=3&prd=MPIL

European Council. (2023). Statement by the members of the European Council (30/9/2022). https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/09/30/statement-by-the-members-of-the-european-council/

Fabbricotti, A. (2005). The diplomatic protection of refugees by their state of asylum. A few remarks on the exclusion of the State of nationality of the refugee from the addressees of the claim. AWR Bulletin, 43(52)/4, 266-272.

Flauss, J.-F. (2003). Protection diplomatique et protection internationale des droits de l’homme. Revue Suisse de droit international et européen, 1, 1-36.

Fortin, A. (2000). The meaning of “protection” in the refugee definition. International Journal of Refugee Law, 12(4), 548-576.

Gaja, G. (2003). Is a state specially affected when its nationals’ human rights are infringed? In L.C. Vohrah, F. Pocar, Y. Featherstone, O. Fourmy, M. F. Graham, J. Hocking, & N. Robson (Eds.), Man’s inhumanity to man (pp. 373-382). Kluwer Law International.

Gakis, S. (2022). L’activation de la directive “Protection temporaire”. l’apport d’un instrument sui generis à la protection des personnes déplacées. Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l’Homme, 132(4), 771-794.

Garibian, S. (2008). Vers l’émergence d’un droit individuel à la protection diplomatique?, Annuaire français de droit international, 54, 119-141.

Heeps, A. (2017). Diplomatic protection and human rights. Quo vadis. King's Student Law Review, 8(2), 1-17.

ILC. (2001). Report of the International Law Commission. Fifty-third session (23 April – 1 June and 2 July to 10 August 2001). UN Doc. A/56/10. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N01/557/81/IMG/N0155781.pdf?OpenElement

ILC. (2004). Report of the International Law Commission. Fifty-sixth session (3 May – 4 June and 5 July – 6 August 2004). UN Doc. A/59/10. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N01/557/81/IMG/N0155781.pdf?OpenElement

ILC. (2006). Report of the International Law Commission. Fifty-eighth session (1 May – 9 June and 3 July – 11 August 2006). UN Doc. A/61/10. https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/reports/a_61_10.pdf

Leys, D. (2016). Diplomatic protection and individual rights. A complementary approach. Harvard International Law Journal Online, 57, 1-14.

Panella, L. (2008). Il progetto di articoli della Commissione di diritto internazionale sulla protezione diplomatica: codificazione e sviluppo progressivo del diritto internazionale. Rivista della Cooperazione Giuridica Internazionale, 28, 54-83.

Pellet, A. (2004). Between codification and progressive development of the law. Some reflections from the ILC. International Law Forum, 6(1), 15-23.

Pellet, A. (2008). The second death of Euripide Mavrommatis? Notes on the International Law Commission’s Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection. The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 7, 33-58.

Ramji-Nogales, J. (2022). Ukrainians in flight. Politics, race, and regional solutions. AJIL Unbound, 116, 150-154.

Reiterer, M. (1984). The protection of refugees by their State of asylum. Abhandlungen zu Flüchtlingsfragen, Volume XVI. Braumüller.

Ridi, N. (2013). The exercise of diplomatic protection on behalf of R´refugees. In V. Sancin, & M. Kovič Dine (Eds), Responsibility to protect in theory and practice (pp. 653-678). GV Založba.

UNGA. (2022). Aggression against Ukraine. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 2 March 2022. UN Doc. A/RES/ES-11/1. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N22/293/36/PDF/N2229336.pdf?OpenElement

UNHCR. (2023, Februar 27). Ukraine refugee situation. Operational data portal. https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/ukraine

Vermeer-Künzli, A. (2007). A matter of interest: Diplomatic protection and State responsibility erga omnes. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 56(3), 553-581.

Zieck, M. (2001). Codification of the law on diplomatic protection. The first eight draft articles. Leiden Journal of International Law, 14(1), 209-232.

Downloads

Published

03/15/2023

How to Cite

Fabbricotti, A. (2023). The Diplomatic Protection of the Ukrainian Refugees by their State of Asylum : A Possible Scenario for the Day after the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict. Quarterly on Refugee Problems - AWR Bulletin, 62(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.57947/qrp.v62i1.45

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.