From Triple Win to Sustainable Labour Migration
Dancing the Dance of Complexity with Transnational Skills Partnerships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57947/qrp.v62i4.81Keywords:
labour migration, triple win, skill partnership, sustainability, vocational trainingAbstract
What does ‘desirable’ or ‘sustainable’ mean in the context of labour migration? And what should programmes geared towards making migration more compatible with development look like? These questions provided the starting point for the ‘Sustainable Labour Migration’ research project implemented by Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences between December 2020 and August 2022. The project looked at how sustainability in different transnational skills partnership schemes was perceived by different stakeholders in three countries chosen as case studies: Georgia, Kosovo and Vietnam. Embracing the notion of a ‘triple win’, many transnational skills partnership schemes aim to deliver benefits for their main stakeholder groups. As well as reflecting critically on this triple-win narrative, this paper also argues for a more nuanced approach in order to grasp the complexity of skilled labour migration. The paper introduces one such approach, namely the sustainable labour migration framework, and highlights the key elements of the research project. It details the methodology used in the study (systematic literature review – employer survey – semi-structured, in-depth interviews – focus group interviews) and explores the perception of sustainability in skilled labour migration with a focus on the cost/benefit ratio, the relationship between vocational education and training and labour migration, and the various arrangements for the partnerships employed in the schemes. In introducing the key findings from the three countries selected for the case studies, the paper highlights that the perception of sustainability is not underpinned by a comprehensive understanding of the term amongst most stakeholders. Within all the schemes, however, some stakeholders identified elements which make a positive contribution to development in the respective countries of origin and thus identify elements of sustainable labour migration with room for improvement in multiple areas. The paper concludes with a presentation of overall policy recommendations: The ongoing reform of Germany’s labour migration policy should be accompanied by more development-oriented activities. As part of this, the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) should stand up more forcefully for the needs of migrants and potential partner countries in order to reduce existing inequalities
References
Abella, M., Gächter, A., & Tschank, J. (2014). A triple win in migration: Ensuring migrant workers’ rights to protect all workers. Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF).
Angenendt, S. (2015). Triple Win – Ein neues Paradigma der Migrationsgestaltung? [Triple Win - A new paradigm for migration design?]. In N. Azahaf (Ed.), Migration gerecht gestalten. Weltweite Impulse für einen fairen Wettbewerb um Fachkräfte [Making migration fair. Global impulses for fair competition for skilled workers] (pp. 55-72). Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Angenendt, S., Bither, J., & Ziebarth, A. (2015). Creating a triple-win through labor migration policy? Lessons from Germany. A report of the Migration Strategy Group 2013-2014. The Robert Bosch Stiftung. The German Marshall Fund of the United States.
Armstrong, J. (2013). Improving international capacity development. Bright spots. Springer ebook collection/Palgrave Economics and Finance Collection 2000-2013. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137310118
Azahaf, N. (2021). Fostering transnational skills partnerships in Germany. Making fair migration a reality [Policy Brief Migration]. Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Bailey, A. J. (2001). Turning transnational. Notes on the theorisation of international migration. International Journal of Population Geography, 7(6), 413-428. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijpg.239
Bauböck, R., & Ruhs, M. (2022). The elusive triple win. Addressing temporary labour migration dilemmas through fair representation. Migration Studies, 10(3), 528-552. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnac021
Beňuška, T., & Nečas, P. (2021). On societal security of the state. Applying a perspective of sustainability to immigration. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(2), 473-487. https://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.9.2(31)
Betts, A., & Collier, P. (2018). Sustainable migration framework (EMN Norway Occasional Papers). European Migration Network/National Contact Point Norway.
Black, R., & Gent, S. (2006). Sustainable return in post-conflict contexts. International Migration, 44(3), 15-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2006.00370.x
Brennan, J., & Wittenborg, A. (2015). Gemeinsam zum Triple Win – Faire Gewinnung von Fachkräften aus Entwicklungs- und Schwellenländern. Kriterien und Länderbeispiele zur Identifizierung geeigneter Herkunftsländer [Together for a triple win - Fair recruitment of skilled workers from developing and emerging countries. Criteria and country examples for identifying suitable countries of origin]. Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Bundesgesetzblatt. (2023). Gesetz zur Weiterentwicklung der Fachkräfteeinwanderung [Law for the further development of skilled worker immigration]. https://www.recht.bund.de/bgbl/1/2023/217/VO.html
Die Bundesregierung. (2021). Mehr Fortschritt wagen. Bündnis für Freiheit, Gerechtigkeit und Nachhaltigkeit [Daring to make more progress. Alliance for freedom, justice and sustainability]. Koalitionsvertrag zwischen SPD, Bündnis 90/Die Grünen und FDP.
Die Bundesregierung. (2022). Fachkräftestrategie der Bundesregierung [The federal government's skilled workers strategy].
Carlowitz, H. C. von. (2022 [1713]). Sylvicultura oeconomica, oder Haußwirthliche Nachricht und Naturmäßige Anweisung zur Wilden Baum-Zucht [Sylvicultura oeconomica, or domestic economic message and natural instructions for wild tree breeding]. (2nd ed.). Munich.
Castles, S., Haas, H. de, & Miller, M. J. (2014). The age of migration. International population movements in the modern world (5th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Castles, S., & Ozkul, D. (2014). Circular migration. Triple win, or a new label for temporary migration? In G. Battistella (Ed.), Global and Asian Perspectives on International Migration (pp. 27-49). Global Migration Issues. Springer.
Churchman, C. W. (1967). Guest editorial. Wicked problems. Management Science, 14(4), B141-B142.
Clemens, M. (2015). Global Skill Partnerships. A proposal for technical training in a mobile world. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 4(2), 1-18.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH. (2019). Nachhaltig ausgerichtete Gewinnung von Pflegekräften (Triple Win) [Sustainably oriented recruitment of nursing staff (Triple win)]. https://www.giz.de/de/weltweit/41533.html
develoPPP. (n.d.). Investing responsibly. Promoting development. Retrieved December 15, 2023, from https://www.developpp.de/en
Erdal, M. B., Carling, J., Horst, C., & Talleraas, C. (2018). Defining sustainable migration (EMN Norway Occasional Papers). European Migration Network/National Contact Point Norway.
Faist, Th., Fauser, M., & Reisenauer, E. (2013). Transnational migration. Polity.
Farris, M. (2021). What is sustainable migration? FOCSIV background document No. 11.
Gavonel, M. F., Adger, W. N., Safra de Campos, R., Boyd, E., Carr, E. R., Fábos, A., Fransen, S., Jolivet, D., Zickgraf, C., Codjoe, S., Abu, M., & Siddiqui, T. (2021). The migration-sustainability paradoxon. Transformation in mobile worlds. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 49, 98-109.
Hooper, K. (2019). Reimagining skilled migration partnerships to support development (Towards a Global Compact for Migration. A Development Perspective Issue No. 5). Migration Policy Institute. German Cooperation.
International Organization for Migration. (2005). World Migration Report 2005. Costs and benefits of international migration.
Kapp, K. W. (1971). The social costs of private enterprise. Schocken Books.
Katseli, L. T., Lucas, R., & Xenogiani, Th. (2006). Effects of migration on sending countries. What do we know? Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(3), 118–121.
Kuckartz, U. (2018). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung [Qualitative content analysis. Methods, practice, computer support] (4th ed.). Grundlagentexte Methoden. Beltz Juventa.
Lange, T. de (2020). A new narrative for European migration policy. Sustainability and the Blue Card recast. European Law Journal, 26(3-4), 274-282.
Lixi, L. (2016). A long-term approach to sustainable labour migration and successful integration. The voice of civil society. 2nd meeting of the European Migration Forum. European Migration Forum. https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2019-02/emf-02-report.pdf
Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis. Basics and techniques] (12th ed.). Beltz.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). What would make Global Skills Partnerships work in practice? (Migration Policy Debates No. 15).
Portes, A. (2010). Migration and social change. Some conceptual reflections. Journal of Ethic and Migration Studies, 36(10), 1537-1563.
Qin, B. (2015). Sustainable development in rural China. Field survey and Sino-Japan comparative analysis. Springer.
Raghuram, P. (2008). Governing the mobility of skills. In C. Gabriel & H. Pellerin (Eds.), Governing international labour migration. Current issues, challenges and dilemmas (pp. 81-94). Routledge/RIPE studies in global political economy. Routledge.
Rasche, L. (2021). EU Talent Partnerships. Fit for purpose? Hertie School/Jacques Delors Centre.
Reich, K. (2021). Der entgrenzte Mensch und die Grenzen der Erde. Wie Erziehung und Verhalten die Nachhaltigkeit erschweren [Humans without boundaries and the boundaries of the earth. How education and behavior make sustainability more difficult] (vol. 1). Westend.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 1973(4), 155-169.
Sauer, M. (2024). Capacity Development für nachhaltige Fachkräftemigration [Capacity development for sustainable skilled migration]. In Bertelsmann Stiftung (Ed.), Skills Partnership (accepted).
Sauer, M., & Volarević, J. (2021). Transnational Skills and Mobility Partnerships (TSMP). Contextual factors, conceptual design and application. Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Scarrow, R. M. (2014). Sustainable migration to the urban west. Environment and growth in an uncertain future. International Journal of Sociology, 44(4), 34-53.
Schmitz-Pranghe, C., Oruč, N., Mielke, K., & Ibričević, A. (2020). Making sure that the emigration of healthcare personnel from Albania and BiH works for all. What Germany can do (BICC Policy Brief No. 8). Bonn International Centre for Conflict Studies (BICC).
Sockett, H. (1998). Levels of partnership. Metropolitan Universities: An International Forum, 8(4), 75-82.
Thränhardt, D. (2008). Migrationspolitik: die bessere Entwicklungspolitik? Wege zur Triple-Win-Situation. Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter, 55(2), 219-230.
United Nations. (2006). Governments can create 'triple wins' for migrants, countries of origin, destination countries, Secretary-General tells General Assembly High-Level Dialogue. SG/SM/10634-GA/10495.
United Nations. (2013). International migration and development. Report of the Secretary-General. UN Doc. A/68/190.
United Nations (Ed.). (2015). Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development. A/RES/69/313. https://www.icnl.org/resources/library/addis-ababa-action-agenda-of-the-third-international-conference-on-financing-for-development
United Nations. (2016a). New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants. A/RES/71/1.
United Nations. (2016b). Transforming our world. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
United Nations. (2019). Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. A/RES/73/195.
Wickramasekara, P. (2011). Circular migration. A triple win or a dead end? (Global Union Research Network Discussion Paper No. 15). Global Migration Policy Associates.
World Health Organization. (2010). WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Quarterly on Refugee Problems - AWR Bulletin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
