Climate Refugees in a Legal Vacuum

Bridging the Protection Gap in the International Refugee Convention

Authors

  • Mustafe Mahamoud Abdillahi Kampala International University image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57947/qrp.v65i1-3.230

Keywords:

Climate Refugees, Protection Gap, 1951 Refugee Convention, Non-Refoulement, Complementary Protection

Abstract

This systematic literature review examined academic literature addressing the legal protection gap for migrants displaced across borders due to climate change. The literature review through PRISMA guidelines explored three research questions by analyzing 120 sources (2005-2024): the arguments for and against the extension of the 1951 Refugee Convention, proposed alternative frameworks, and the main barriers to the implementation. The analysis corroborated the main inadequacy of the Convention as its principal definition – requiring persecution connected to a specific civil or political status -  was incompatible with the impersonal, multi-causal nature of climate displacement. The literature produced a variety of proposals, with the guidance of a multi-layered governance approach as the preferred way to go over a single instrument. Among these were the evolutionary interpretation of human rights law for complementary protection, the strategic use of soft-law tools like the Global Compacts, and the prioritization of regional and bilateral pathways. Moreover, the review pointed out that the main barriers to the needed political and normative changes are the attribution of responsibility, the securitization of migrants, and state sovereignty. It argued that overcoming the protection gap demands a realistic, polycentric approach that not only works within the law but also engages regional innovation and progressively builds the political will necessary for a future framework that is more just and comprehensive than the present one.

Author Biography

  • Mustafe Mahamoud Abdillahi, Kampala International University

    Dr. Mustafe Mahamoud Abdillahi is a lecturer in the Department of Political and Administration Studies at Kampala International University, Uganda.

References

Abebe, A. M. (2023). The potential of the OAU Refugee Convention in addressing climate displacement in Africa. International Journal of Refugee Law, 35(1), 45-67. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eead004

Adeola, R. (2023). The Kampala Convention and climate-induced internal displacement in Africa: Norms, implementation, and challenges. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 15(2), 330-348. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huad010

Bedford, C., & Bedford, R. (2020). Pacific migration and labour mobility: Development for climate resilience? The Development Policy Centre. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3684541

Bermúdez, L., & Espinosa, C. (2024). Mexico’s refugee law reform: A new pathway for climate-displaced persons? Forced Migration Review, (73), 45-47. https://www.fmreview.org/sites/fmr/files/FMRdownloads/en/climate-change-displacement/bermudez-espinosa.pdf

Bettini, G. (2013). Climate barbarians at the gate? A critique of apocalyptic narratives on ‘climate refugees’. Geoforum, 45, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.09.009

Biermann, F., & Boas, I. (2023). Refugees and climate change: Towards a new protection regime. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803926178

Boas, I., de Moor, J., & Dahm, R. (2021). The climate-migration nexus: A reorientation. In T. Bastia, & R. Skeldon (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Migration and Development (pp. 287-298). Routledge.

Boas, I., & Rothe, D. (2023). From conflict to crisis: The securitisation of climate migration. Politics and Governance, 11(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6375

Burkett, M. (2023). Nation Ex-Situ: On the future of the disappearing state. Oxford University Press.

Clement, V., Rigaud, K. K., de Sherbinin, A., Jones, B., Adamo, S., Schewe, J., Sadiq, N., & Shabahat, E. (2021). Groundswell part 2: Acting on internal climate migration. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/36248

Farbotko, C., & Dun, O. (2022). Gaps in migration and climate change research: The case of Australia’s Pacific Labour Scheme. Migration and Development, 11(3), 421-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/21632324.2021.1972695

Fischel de Andrade, J. H. (2023). The Cartagena Declaration and the protection of persons displaced by disasters in Latin America. International Migration, 61(3), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13085

Foster, M. (2020). International refugee law and the protection of stateless persons. Oxford University Press.

Foster, M., & McAdam, J. (2022). The Refugee Convention and the protection of people fleeing climate change. International Journal of Refugee Law, 34(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeac008

Gerver, M. (2018). The ethical limits of the global refugee regime. World Politics, 70(3), 446-482. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887118000035

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844

International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2023). World migration report 2024. IOM. https://worldmigrationreport.iom.int/wmr-2024-interactive/

Kälin, W., & Entwisle Chapuisat, H. (2023). Guiding principles on internal displacement: Annotations (2nd ed.). Brookings Institution & University of Bern.

Mayer, B. (2022). The international law on climate change. Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, B. (2023). The loss and damage fund and human mobility: A critical assessment. Climate Policy, 23(8), 1000-1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2218903

McAdam, J. (2022). Climate change, forced migration, and international law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

McAdam, J., & Burson, B. (2023). The Global Compacts and climate change displacement: A critical analysis. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 42(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdac030

McNamara, K. E., & Jackson, G. (2023). From labour mobility to rights-based mobility partnerships in the Pacific. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 64(1), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12365

Milan, A. (2023). Sovereignty bargains in climate migration governance. Global Policy, 14(S3), 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13245

Nash, K. (2023). Multi-causality and the challenge for refugee status determination in the context of climate change. Journal of Refugee Studies, 36(2), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feac064

Pacific Islands Forum. (2018). Boe Declaration on Regional Security. https://www.forumsec.org/2018/09/05/boe-declaration-on-regional-security/

Pires, M. (2024). Beyond Teitiota: The next decade of climate migration jurisprudence. Georgetown Environmental Law Review, 36(2), 215-240.

Platform on Disaster Displacement (PDD). (2023). Annual report of the Platform on Disaster Displacement. https://disasterdisplacement.org

Rajan, S. I. (Ed.). (2021). Climate change, vulnerability and migration. Routledge.

Scott, M. (2023). Human rights framing and climate displacement: From securitization to empowerment. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 14(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2023.01.01

Sharma, A. (2017). Climate justice and loss and damage. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 9(4), 488-491. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-02-2017-0034

Singh, S. K. (2023). Particular social group claims in climate-related asylum cases: An insurmountable hurdle? Refugee Law Initiative Working Paper No. 58.

United Nations (UN). (2018). Global Compact on Refugees & Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. UN. https://www.unhcr.org/the-global-compact-on-refugees.html & https://refugeesmigrants.un.org/migration-compact

UNHCR. (2023). Legal considerations regarding claims for international protection made in the context of the adverse effects of climate change and disasters. UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/media/legal-considerations-regarding-claims-international-protection-made-context-adverse-effects

UNHCR. (2024). No escape: On the frontlines of climate change, conflict and forced displacement. UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/reports/no-escape-climate-change-conflict-forced-displacement

UN Human Rights Committee (UN HRC). (2020). Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand (CCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016). https://juris.ohchr.org/Search/Details/2728

Wewerinke-Singh, M., & Loper, H. (2021). Between a rock and a hard place: The ‘particular social group’ category in climate-related asylum claims. Climate Law, 11(3), 242-267. https://doi.org/10.1163/18786561-11030003

World Bank. (2023). World Development Report 2023: Migrants, refugees, and societies. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1956-7

Zetter, R., & Ruaudel, H. (2023). The evolution of soft-law protection for cross-border disaster displacement. International Migration, 61(1), 67-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13023

Downloads

Published

09/15/2026

How to Cite

Climate Refugees in a Legal Vacuum: Bridging the Protection Gap in the International Refugee Convention. (2026). Quarterly on Refugee Problems - AWR Bulletin, 65(1-3), 59-81. https://doi.org/10.57947/qrp.v65i1-3.230

Similar Articles

41-50 of 71

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.